Comparative Analysis of the Alternative Energy: Case of Reducing GHG Emissions of Estonian Pilot Fleet

Otsason, R.; Laasma, A.; Gülmez, Y.; Kotta, J.; Tapaninen, U. (2025). Comparative Analysis of the Alternative Energy: Case of Reducing GHG Emissions of Estonian Pilot Fleet. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 13(2), 305.https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13020305

@article{Otsason-2025-3981,
author = {Otsason, R and Laasma, A and Gülmez, Y and Kotta, J and Tapaninen, U},
title = {Comparative Analysis of the Alternative Energy: Case of Reducing GHG Emissions of Estonian Pilot Fleet},
journal = {Journal of Marine Science and Engineering},
year = {2025},
month = {feb},
publisher = {MDPI},
volume = {13},
number = {2},
pages = {305},
doi = {10.3390/jmse13020305},
url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/13/2/305},
keywords = {Biogenic Gases, Wastes and Byproducts, Ammonia, Biodiesel (FAME), Methane (Natural Gas), Marine Diesel Oil (MDO), Renewable Diesel (HVO / FT), Hydrogen, Biochemical, Fuel Properties and Characteristics, Engine Testing and Performance, Ocean-going Vessels},
}

TY - JOUR
TI - Comparative Analysis of the Alternative Energy: Case of Reducing GHG Emissions of Estonian Pilot Fleet
AU - Otsason, R
AU - Laasma, A
AU - Gülmez, Y
AU - Kotta, J
AU - Tapaninen, U
T2 - Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
AB - The FuelEU Maritime Regulation, part of the European Union’s (EU’s) Fit for 55 initiative, aims to achieve significant reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions within the maritime sector. This study assesses the feasibility of alternative fuels for the Estonian pilot fleet using a Well-to-Wake (WtW) life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. Operational data from 18 vessels, sourced from the Estonian State Fleet’s records, were analyzed, including technical specifications, fuel consumption patterns, and operational scenarios. The study focused on marine diesel oil (MDO), biomethane, hydrogen, biodiesel, ammonia, and hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO), each presenting distinct trade-offs. Biomethane achieved a 59% GHG emissions reduction but required a volumetric storage capacity up to 353% higher compared to MDO. Biodiesel reduced GHG emissions by 41.2%, offering moderate compatibility with existing systems while requiring up to 23% larger storage volumes. HVO demonstrated a 43.6% emissions reduction with seamless integration into existing marine engines. Ammonia showed strong potential for long-term decarbonization, but its adoption is hindered by low energy density and complex storage requirements. This research underscores the importance of a holistic evaluation of alternative fuels, taking into account technical, economic, and environmental factors specific to regional and operational contexts. The findings offer a quantitative basis for policymakers and maritime stakeholders to develop effective decarbonization strategies for the Baltic Sea region.
DA - 2025/02//
PY - 2025
PB - MDPI
VL - 13
IS - 2
SP - 305
UR - https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/13/2/305
DO - 10.3390/jmse13020305
LA - English
KW - Biogenic Gases
KW - Wastes and Byproducts
KW - Ammonia
KW - Biodiesel (FAME)
KW - Methane (Natural Gas)
KW - Marine Diesel Oil (MDO)
KW - Renewable Diesel (HVO / FT)
KW - Hydrogen
KW - Biochemical
KW - Fuel Properties and Characteristics
KW - Engine Testing and Performance
KW - Ocean-going Vessels
ER -