Journal Article
Title: Environmental assessment of marine fuels: liquefied natural gas, liquefied biogas, methanol and bio-methanol
Publication Date:
Journal:
Journal of Cleaner Production
Volume:
74
Pages:
86-95
Publisher:
Elsevier
Fuels Group:
Fuel Blends Mentioned?
Yes
Feedstocks Group:
Pathways Group:
Vessel Segment:
Language:
English
Document Access
Website:
Citation
APA
Brynolf, S.; Fridell, E.; Andersson, K. (2014). Environmental assessment of marine fuels: liquefied natural gas, liquefied biogas, methanol and bio-methanol. Journal of Cleaner Production, 74, 86-95.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.052
BibTex
@article{Brynolf-2014-4013,
author = {Brynolf, S and Fridell, E and Andersson, K},
title = {Environmental assessment of marine fuels: liquefied natural gas, liquefied biogas, methanol and bio-methanol},
journal = {Journal of Cleaner Production},
year = {2014},
month = {jul},
publisher = {Elsevier},
volume = {74},
pages = {86--95},
doi = {10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.052},
url = {https://methanol.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/FCBI-Methanol-Marine-Fuel-Report-Final-English.pdf},
keywords = {Fossil-derived Hydrocarbons, Agriculture: Energy Crops, Methanol, Heavy Fuel Oil (HFO), Thermochemical, Lifecycle Assessment (LCA) and Air Emissions, Ocean-going Vessels},
}
author = {Brynolf, S and Fridell, E and Andersson, K},
title = {Environmental assessment of marine fuels: liquefied natural gas, liquefied biogas, methanol and bio-methanol},
journal = {Journal of Cleaner Production},
year = {2014},
month = {jul},
publisher = {Elsevier},
volume = {74},
pages = {86--95},
doi = {10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.052},
url = {https://methanol.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/FCBI-Methanol-Marine-Fuel-Report-Final-English.pdf},
keywords = {Fossil-derived Hydrocarbons, Agriculture: Energy Crops, Methanol, Heavy Fuel Oil (HFO), Thermochemical, Lifecycle Assessment (LCA) and Air Emissions, Ocean-going Vessels},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Environmental assessment of marine fuels: liquefied natural gas, liquefied biogas, methanol and bio-methanol
AU - Brynolf, S
AU - Fridell, E
AU - Andersson, K
T2 - Journal of Cleaner Production
AB - The combined effort of reducing the emissions of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and greenhouse gases to comply with future regulations and reduce impact on climate change will require a significant change in ship propulsion. One alternative is to change fuels. In this study we compare the life cycle environmental performance of liquefied natural gas (LNG), liquefied biogas (LBG), methanol and bio-methanol. We also highlight a number of important aspects to consider when selecting marine fuels. A transition to use of LNG or methanol produced from natural gas would significantly improve the overall environmental performance. However, the impact on climate change is of the same order of magnitude as with use of heavy fuel oil. It is only the use of LBG and bio-methanol that has the potential to reduce the climate impact. The analysis did not show any significant differences in environmental performance between methane and methanol when produced from the same raw materials, but the performance of the methanol engines are yet to be validated.
DA - 2014/07//
PY - 2014
PB - Elsevier
VL - 74
SP - 86
EP - 95
UR - https://methanol.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/FCBI-Methanol-Marine-Fuel-Report-Final-English.pdf
DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.052
LA - English
KW - Fossil-derived Hydrocarbons
KW - Agriculture: Energy Crops
KW - Methanol
KW - Heavy Fuel Oil (HFO)
KW - Thermochemical
KW - Lifecycle Assessment (LCA) and Air Emissions
KW - Ocean-going Vessels
ER -
TI - Environmental assessment of marine fuels: liquefied natural gas, liquefied biogas, methanol and bio-methanol
AU - Brynolf, S
AU - Fridell, E
AU - Andersson, K
T2 - Journal of Cleaner Production
AB - The combined effort of reducing the emissions of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and greenhouse gases to comply with future regulations and reduce impact on climate change will require a significant change in ship propulsion. One alternative is to change fuels. In this study we compare the life cycle environmental performance of liquefied natural gas (LNG), liquefied biogas (LBG), methanol and bio-methanol. We also highlight a number of important aspects to consider when selecting marine fuels. A transition to use of LNG or methanol produced from natural gas would significantly improve the overall environmental performance. However, the impact on climate change is of the same order of magnitude as with use of heavy fuel oil. It is only the use of LBG and bio-methanol that has the potential to reduce the climate impact. The analysis did not show any significant differences in environmental performance between methane and methanol when produced from the same raw materials, but the performance of the methanol engines are yet to be validated.
DA - 2014/07//
PY - 2014
PB - Elsevier
VL - 74
SP - 86
EP - 95
UR - https://methanol.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/FCBI-Methanol-Marine-Fuel-Report-Final-English.pdf
DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.052
LA - English
KW - Fossil-derived Hydrocarbons
KW - Agriculture: Energy Crops
KW - Methanol
KW - Heavy Fuel Oil (HFO)
KW - Thermochemical
KW - Lifecycle Assessment (LCA) and Air Emissions
KW - Ocean-going Vessels
ER -