Report
Document Access
Citation
APA
BibTex
author = {California Air Resources Board},
title = {Recommended Emissions Testing Guidelines for Ocean-going Vessels},
institution = {California Air Resources Board},
year = {2012},
month = {jun},
url = {https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2019-12/panamax%20boiler%20report%20final_ADA.pdf},
keywords = {Unspecified Feedstock, Unspecified Pathway, Engine Testing and Performance, Codes, Standards and Regulation, Ocean-going Vessels},
}
RIS
TI - Recommended Emissions Testing Guidelines for Ocean-going Vessels
AU - California Air Resources Board
AB - The California Air Resources Board (ARB) staff has developed Recommended Emissions Testing Guidelines for Ocean-going Vessels (guidelines) to provide testing guidance in support of control equipment manufacturers, Port programs and regulatory requirements. The development of the guidelines was aided by the technical support of the researchers at CE-CERT, University of California, Riverside. Modeled after ARB’s Diesel Emission Control Strategies Verification, these guidelines outline the information and testing needed to allow ARB staff to evaluate and quantify the emission reductions associated with ocean-going vessel emission control strategies. They include components to support the evaluation of control strategies that are not subject to regulatory requirements (non-regulatory applications) and those that are subject to regulatory requirements (regulatory applications). An example of a regulatory application is the evaluation of control strategies subject to regulatory requirements under the At Berth Equivalent Emissions Reduction Option (At-Berth Equivalency) in ARB’s Airborne Toxic Control Measure for Auxiliary Diesel Engines Operated on Ocean-going Vessels At-Berth in a California Port. The guidelines address the following information and data collection needed to evaluate and quantify the emission reductions for ocean-going vessel emission reduction technologies: Applicability-Range of Product Evaluation: establishing an emission control group; Emission Reduction Performance Testing: baseline and controlled testing using appropriate test cycles or test loads; In-Use Performance and Durability: demonstrating performance over an established time period, and; Periodic Testing: generally required under regulatory programs or permitting. The evaluation of control strategies either used for non-regulatory applications or regulatory applications should include all four components, and any additional requirements or supplemental analyses specified in the regulation(s). For the non-regulatory application, the fourth component is necessary to help facilitate accounting of the emission reduction benefits in emission inventories and current and future air quality planning efforts. In the following sections, the information needs, testing procedures, reporting, control device description and operational parameters, and quality controls necessary to evaluate the control technology are described.
DA - 2012/06//
PY - 2012
SP - 28
PB - California Air Resources Board
UR - https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2019-12/panamax%20boiler%20report%20final_ADA.pdf
LA - English
KW - Unspecified Feedstock
KW - Unspecified Pathway
KW - Engine Testing and Performance
KW - Codes, Standards and Regulation
KW - Ocean-going Vessels
ER -
Abstract
The California Air Resources Board (ARB) staff has developed Recommended Emissions Testing Guidelines for Ocean-going Vessels (guidelines) to provide testing guidance in support of control equipment manufacturers, Port programs and regulatory requirements. The development of the guidelines was aided by the technical support of the researchers at CE-CERT, University of California, Riverside. Modeled after ARB’s Diesel Emission Control Strategies Verification, these guidelines outline the information and testing needed to allow ARB staff to evaluate and quantify the emission reductions associated with ocean-going vessel emission control strategies. They include components to support the evaluation of control strategies that are not subject to regulatory requirements (non-regulatory applications) and those that are subject to regulatory requirements (regulatory applications). An example of a regulatory application is the evaluation of control strategies subject to regulatory requirements under the At Berth Equivalent Emissions Reduction Option (At-Berth Equivalency) in ARB’s Airborne Toxic Control Measure for Auxiliary Diesel Engines Operated on Ocean-going Vessels At-Berth in a California Port. The guidelines address the following information and data collection needed to evaluate and quantify the emission reductions for ocean-going vessel emission reduction technologies: Applicability-Range of Product Evaluation: establishing an emission control group; Emission Reduction Performance Testing: baseline and controlled testing using appropriate test cycles or test loads; In-Use Performance and Durability: demonstrating performance over an established time period, and; Periodic Testing: generally required under regulatory programs or permitting. The evaluation of control strategies either used for non-regulatory applications or regulatory applications should include all four components, and any additional requirements or supplemental analyses specified in the regulation(s). For the non-regulatory application, the fourth component is necessary to help facilitate accounting of the emission reduction benefits in emission inventories and current and future air quality planning efforts. In the following sections, the information needs, testing procedures, reporting, control device description and operational parameters, and quality controls necessary to evaluate the control technology are described.