Journal Article
Document Access
Citation
APA
BibTex
author = {Van Der Kroft, D and Pruyn, J},
title = {A Study into the Availability, Costs and GHG Reduction in Drop-In Biofuels for Shipping under Different Regimes between 2020 and 2050},
journal = {Sustainability},
year = {2021},
month = {sep},
publisher = {MDPI},
volume = {13},
pages = {9900},
doi = {10.3390/su13179900},
url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9900},
keywords = {Forest Biomass, Wastes and Byproducts, Agriculture: Food and Oil Crops, Agriculture: Energy Crops, Biodiesel (FAME), Renewable Diesel (HVO / FT), Catalysis, Thermochemical, Markets and Forecasting, Techno-Economic Analysis (TEA), Ocean-going Vessels},
}
RIS
TI - A Study into the Availability, Costs and GHG Reduction in Drop-In Biofuels for Shipping under Different Regimes between 2020 and 2050
AU - Van Der Kroft, D
AU - Pruyn, J
T2 - Sustainability
AB - In this study, various scenarios were developed that correspond to estimations of future biomass availability and biofuel demand from the maritime industry. These marine biofuel demand scenarios were based on the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) reduction targets of the Renewable Energy Directive II (RED II) and the International Maritime Organization (IMO). A multi-objective Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) model was developed which is used to optimize the Well-to-Tank (WtT) phases of each studied scenario. This resulted in an overview of the most feasible use of feedstocks, deployment of new conversion technologies and trade flows between regions. Additionally, the results provided insight into the costs and emission reduction potential of marine biofuels. By analyzing the results from this study, improved insight into the potential of drop-in biofuels for reaching the proposed emission reduction targets for the maritime sector was developed. A trade-off between costs and emissions was found to result in potential GHG reductions between 68–95% compared to Heavy Fuel Oil (HFO) for 800–2300 EUR/ton. More specifically, 80% GHG reduction compared to HFO can be achieved at fuel costs of between 900–1050 EUR/ton over the studied time period.
DA - 2021/09//
PY - 2021
PB - MDPI
VL - 13
SP - 9900
UR - https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9900
DO - 10.3390/su13179900
LA - English
KW - Forest Biomass
KW - Wastes and Byproducts
KW - Agriculture: Food and Oil Crops
KW - Agriculture: Energy Crops
KW - Biodiesel (FAME)
KW - Renewable Diesel (HVO / FT)
KW - Catalysis
KW - Thermochemical
KW - Markets and Forecasting
KW - Techno-Economic Analysis (TEA)
KW - Ocean-going Vessels
ER -
Abstract
In this study, various scenarios were developed that correspond to estimations of future biomass availability and biofuel demand from the maritime industry. These marine biofuel demand scenarios were based on the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) reduction targets of the Renewable Energy Directive II (RED II) and the International Maritime Organization (IMO). A multi-objective Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) model was developed which is used to optimize the Well-to-Tank (WtT) phases of each studied scenario. This resulted in an overview of the most feasible use of feedstocks, deployment of new conversion technologies and trade flows between regions. Additionally, the results provided insight into the costs and emission reduction potential of marine biofuels. By analyzing the results from this study, improved insight into the potential of drop-in biofuels for reaching the proposed emission reduction targets for the maritime sector was developed. A trade-off between costs and emissions was found to result in potential GHG reductions between 68–95% compared to Heavy Fuel Oil (HFO) for 800–2300 EUR/ton. More specifically, 80% GHG reduction compared to HFO can be achieved at fuel costs of between 900–1050 EUR/ton over the studied time period.